*** This article is written with the help of Google Translate… ***
350 ( +84 from the day before) new infections confirmed in Tokyo.
◆◆◆ Japan ◆◆◆
(Today)
Number of people infected nationwide : 1,308 ( +343)
Number of people deaths nationwide : 101 ( +28)
Number of people infected in Tokyo : 350 ( +84)
*( )= increase from the day before
(Cumulative)
Number of people infected nationwide : 419,765 ( +1,307)
Number of people deaths nationwide : 7,157 ( +101)
Number of hospital discharges : 388,399 ( +2,643)
*( )= increase from the day before
* Since revisions are made daily by local governments and the media,
the cumulative total may differ from the new figures for the day.
Number of seriously ill persons nationwide : 644 ( -14)
（Other）
Narita Airport Quarantine : 1 ( +-0 / Total 2,347)
*( )= increase from the day before
(Cumulative) * The following is up to 10 worst prefectures.
▽東京都 (Tokyo) 107,959人 (前日+ 350人)
▽大阪府 (Osaka) 46,114人 (前日+ 98人)
▽神奈川県 (Kanagawa) 43,467人 (前日+ 133人)
▽埼玉県 (Saitama) 27,968人(前日+114人)
▽愛知県 (Aichi) 25,336人 (前日+ 63人)
▽千葉県 (Chiba) 24,850人 (前日+145人)
▽北海道 (Hokkaido) 18,578人 (前日+ 44人)
▽兵庫県 (Hyogo) 17,586人 (前日+ 46人)
▽福岡県 (Fukuoka) 17,490人 (前日+48人)
▽京都府 (Kyoto) 8,940人 (前日+ 17人)
*( )= increase from the day before
(*All of the above from 2021/02/16 22:52 / NHK NEWS WEB)
◆◆◆ World ◆◆◆
（Cumulative）
Number of people infected nationwide ： 109,744,108 ( +297,791)
Number of people deaths nationwide ： 2,420,501 ( +7,788)
Number of hospital discharges ： 84,306,541 ( +2,763,148) ←???
( All of the above from 2021/02/16 20:10 / worldometers)
*( )= increase from the day before
The number of newly infected people in Tokyo has decreased compared to the same Tuesday last week, but I feel that the decrease is slowing down …
I hope it will continue to decrease as it is …
Meanwhile… How about the amount of people in the city in Tokyo…
(Around 15:00 on Feb 16, Shibuya Scramble Crossing, Tokyo)
There are fewer people than usual because of the rain …!
Well, I will summarize
the breakdown of the number of new infections in Tokyo + α …!
Out of [350] new infections in Tokyo
・Today’s newly infected people are men and women in their under10 to over100
・[118] people is in their 20s to 30s
(about 34% of the total)
・[100] people is in their 40s to 50s
(about 29% of the total)
*under10 : [12] persons
*10s : [15] persons
*20s : [65] persons
*30s : [53] persons
*40s : [41] persons
*50s : [59] persons
*60s : [23] persons
*70s : [34] persons
*80s : [36] persons
*90s : [11] persons
*over100 : [1] persons
・ [N/A] people is
in 『the entertainment district at night』
→Employees and guests such as host clubs and cabaret clubs
・Infection at home [79] people
・Infection at office [10] people
・Infection at a dinner with friends and acquaintances [3] people
・Infection in the facility [52] people
・Infection via other routes [N/A] people
* Infection in the facility [52] people
[10] medical institutions, [20] people
+ [13] facilities for the elderly, [29] people
*Bed usage rate: 47.4% (←47.8%)
for severely ill people: 29.2% (←30.8%)
*( )= Number of the previous day
(As of Feb 16)
(Individual infection information
・It seems that [27] people have died in Tokyo today …
＜Number of deaths by route＞
・Facilities for the elderly ― [N/A] person(s)
・Hospital ― [14] person(s)
・Home ― [N/A] person(s)
・Unknown ― [N/A] person(s)
(Outbreak information)
・Today, I could not confirm the outbreak information, only individual information …
*** Information on people under medical treatment in Tokyo ***
Number of hospitalized ： 2,323 ( -18)
Number of seriously ill ： 92 ( -5)
Hotel medical treatment ： 416 ( -28)
Home medical treatment ： 989 ( -39)
Adjusting for “hospitalization or hotel or home treatment” ： 883 ( -896)
People discharged from hospital or
those who have completed medical treatment at home： 102,184 ( +1,304)
*( )= increase from the day before
Net increase in infected people in Tokyo
＝ (Number of new infections)
－ (Number of people who completed medical treatment)
－ (Number of deaths)
＝ 350 － 1,304 － 27
＝ -981 people
Estimated total number of infected people in Tokyo as of today
＝ (Number of positives)
－ (end of medical treatment period such as discharge)
－ (Number of deaths)
＝ 109,959 － 102,184 － 1,164
＝ 6,611 people
*Tokyo currently has 12 facilities for infected people
(Capacity of 4,947 people)
* A hospital in Tokyo has secured 3280 beds (+220 beds for critically ill patients).
→ Aim to secure 3750 beds (+250 beds for critically ill patients).
* In addition, we will open two specialized hospitals from September to October, and plan to add another 200 beds.
*The hotels are that,
“the b Ikebukuro”, “DayniceHOTEL Tokyo”,
“Toyoko INN Shinjukukabukicho”,
“Toyoko INN Tokyo Station Shinoohashimae”,
“Shinagawa Prince Hotel (East Tower)”,
“Apa Hotel Asakusa Taharamachi Ekimae”,
“Tokyo Toranomon Tokyu REI Hotel”,
“Toyoko Inn Fuchu Nanbu Line Minamitama Station”,
“APA Hotel & Resort Nishi-Shinjuku 5-chome Station Tower”,
“Tokyo Pet-accompanied accommodation facility”,
“APA Hotel Yamanote Otsuka Station Tower”,
“Toyoko Inn Ikebukuro North Exit II”
*The source of the total number of infected persons is from 東京都
■ Of today’s number of infected people [350] …
・Rich contacts [157] people
(about 45% of the total)
・Unknown infection route [193] people
(about 55% of the total)
・Overseas travel history holder [0] person(s)
* Bringing in samples from outside of Tokyo [8 cases]
・Quarantine at the airport
| Case study | Response (arrival date) |
Age | gender | residence | Behavior history | Symptom |
| 2174 | Narita (2/15) |
20’s | male | Osaka | Mexico | cough |
*From the website of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
・Mutants are still found today …
| No | Age | sex | residence | Symptoms / progress | Remarks |
| 1 | Under 10 years old | Female | Saitama | Mid-January Onset Late January Medical treatment cancellation |
・ Contact with patient No. 8 announced on 2/8 ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 2 | Forties | Female | Saitama | Late January Onset Early February Hospitalization |
・ Persons involved in the same facility in the 2/5 published materials ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 3 | Forties | Female | Tokyo | Late January Onset Early February Hospitalization |
・ Close contact with patients with coronavirus infection (reference ① below) ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 4 | Undisclosed | Female | Kyoto | Early February Onset Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 5 | Undisclosed | Female | Kagoshima prefecture | Early February Positive found Early February Hospitalized |
・ No history of stay in the UK ・ No contact with the general public |
| 6 | Undisclosed | Female | Kagoshima prefecture | Early February Positive found Early February Hospitalized |
・ No history of stay in the UK ・ No contact with the general public |
| 7 | Undisclosed | Female | Kagoshima prefecture | Early February Positive found Early February Hospitalized |
・ No history of stay in the UK ・ No contact with the general public |
| 8 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Onset Early February Hospitalization |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 9 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Onset Early February Hospitalization |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| Ten | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Onset Early February Hospitalization |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 11 | Undisclosed | male | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Onset Early February Hospitalization |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 12 | Undisclosed | male | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 13 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 14 | Undisclosed | male | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 15 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 16 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 17 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 18 | Undisclosed | male | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 19 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| 20 | Undisclosed | Female | Niigata Prefecture | Early February Positive found Mid-February Hospitalized |
・ Persons involved in the same facility ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| twenty one | 30s | male | Hyogo prefecture | Onset in early February |
・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| twenty two | 60s | male | Hyogo prefecture | Early February Positive findings (no symptoms) | ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
| twenty three | Forties | male | Hyogo prefecture | Onset in early February | ・ No history of staying abroad ・ No contact with an unspecified number of people |
From the website of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
*Since the number of new infections in Tokyo seems to be almost the number of the previous day,
(Because the deadline for the number of new infections on the day is from 9:00 am the day before to 9:00 am on the day)
And also today, I will summarize some prefectures that have a high number of infected people, not just in the Tokyo area.
*** Saitama ***
・New infections are [114] people
→Saitama City [24] person(s)
Kawaguchi City [3] person(s)
Koshigaya City [8] person(s)
Kawagoe City [2] person(s)
Other municipalities [77] person(s)
* I’m sorry, but the number of people in Saitama by region comes out, but the details are often late or not come out on the day …
*** Kanagawa ***
・New infections are [133] people
・Rich contacts [69] people
・Unknown infection route [64] people
(Individual infection information)
・”Shin-Yokohama Kokoro no Hospital”
*Today [5] person(s) / Cumulative [10] person(s)
・Welfare facilities for the elderly in Hiratsuka
*Today [1] person(s) / Cumulative [29] person(s)
*Among the infected people counted today, there are [7] cluster relationships, including the above.. (Other than the above, add 1 or less each)
*** Chiba ***
・New infections are [145] people
(Individual infection information)
・”Sanai Memorial Hospital” in Chiba City
*Today [3] person(s) / Cumulative [9] person(s)
・ “Shinmatsudo Central General Hospital” in Matsudo City
*Today [5] person(s) / Cumulative [21] person(s)
* Tokyo Disneyland in Urayasu City will close the park one hour ahead of schedule to prevent infection with the new coronavirus. (9 pm → 8 pm)
*** Osaka ***
・New infections are [98] people
・ I couldn’t confirm the information today …
*** Aichi ***
・New infections are [63] people
→Nagoya City [21] people
*** Okinawa ***
・New infections are [13] people
→US military base：[N/A] person(s)
*Cumulative 919 US military personel
*Not included in the number of infected people in Okinawa
*** Fukuoka ***
・New infections are [48] person(s)
→Fukuoka City [13] people
→Kitakyushu City [11] people
◆◆◆ Hokkaido ◆◆◆
・New infections are [44] person(s)
→Sapporo City [16] people
(Individual infection information)
・”Eniwa Daiichi Hospital” in Eniwa City
*Today [5] person(s) / Cumulative [32] person(s)
・”Asahikawa Business High School” in Asahikawa City
*Today [6] person(s) / Cumulative [9] person(s)
*Among the infected people counted today, there are [6] cluster relationships, including the above.. (Other than the above, add 2 or less each)
* In Hokkaido, outbreaks are rarely known on the day of the outbreak, and since it will be revealed and announced the next day or later, the cumulative number of people will be announced instead of the number on the day of the outbreak.
◆◆◆ Hyogo ◆◆◆
・New infections are [46] person(s)
(Individual infection information)
・Welfare facilities for the elderly in the Kato area
*Today [1] person(s) / Cumulative [24] person(s)
・”Takahashi Internal Medicine Cardiovascular Clinic” in Nishinomiya City
*Today [new] person(s) / Cumulative [8] person(s)
* British mutants [3] people
◆◆◆ Kyoto ◆◆◆
・New infections are [17] person(s)
・ I couldn’t confirm the information today …
* Others At this time (20:30), it seems that more than 10 people have been confirmed to be infected in the following areas …
▽ Ibaraki Prefecture has 5411 people (21)
▽ Hiroshima prefecture has 4977 people (15)
▽ Shizuoka Prefecture has 4872 people (15)
▽ Gifu prefecture has 4515 people (26)
▽ Gunma Prefecture has 4296 people (14)
▽ Tochigi Prefecture has 3981 people (10)
▽ Nara Prefecture has 3209 people (10)
▽ Mie Prefecture has 2408 people (15)
▽ Kagoshima Prefecture has 1738 people (12)
▽ Ishikawa Prefecture has 1714 people (21)
*Graph of the number of newly infected people in Japan as of yesterday
(* This bar graph is up to the previous day, so today’s red bar (handwritten) is on the far right, but it’s about this …)
(*”Since the graph shows only the numbers up to the previous day, I handwritten the rightmost bar, but this is about it!”)
(*NHK NEWS WEB)
The state of emergency was reissued on Jan 7, and I summarized yesterday, but I think I’ll use it for a while (← I am easy to forget various things…lol), so I wrote another article about it!
↑It’s easy to summarize what will happen with the state of emergency and which industries and places will be requested to refrain from doing so!
I think that the information will be updated more and more today in preparation for the start of vaccination in Japan from February 17th tomorrow, but I will summarize the information at the moment!
Regarding the “side effects of vaccines” that everyone is concerned about, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare is said to conduct a questionnaire targeting 3 million people who have been vaccinated!
(* It seems that the questionnaire will be conducted after April)
No…, why don’t they ask everyone …?
By the way, aoubt “side effects”…
＜About side reactions after vaccination by Pfizer＞
(*The United States)
▽ Pain at the place of inoculation － 67.7%
▽ Fatigue － 28.6%
▽ Headache － 25.6%
▽ Muscle pain － 17.2%
▽ Fever － 7.4%
▽ Joint pain － 7.1%
▽ Chills － 7%
▽ Nausea － 7%
▽ Swelling － 6.8%
(* For about 1 million people who received the first vaccination)
▽ Severe allergic reaction
→ Only 50 out of 9,943,247
(* Statistics up to January 18)
* Time when symptoms appear
Within 15 minutes after inoculation － 74%
Within 30 minutes after inoculation － 90%
Such a severe allergic reaction seems to be 1 in 200,000!
(* 80% seems to have some allergies)
By the way …
It seems that there will be a follow-up time of about 15 minutes after inoculation to deal with side reactions, so it’s safe!
And there was an easy-to-understand explanation of the syringe problem!
* Vaccine syringe problem …
the number of vaccines that can be collected from one container of vaccine has decreased from 6 to 5 and the number of people who can be vaccinated has become a big problem.
It actually looks like follows…!
(* Blue syringe above … Syringe that can be taken 6 times)
(* White syringe below … Syringe that can only be taken 5 times)
when inhaling orange juice, ｔhe syringe (white onewhich can only be taken only 5 times), is wasted on the tip
It seems that the government has urgently requested the manufacturer to increase production, but I hope it will be in time for the large-scale inoculation …!
Because if the supply is not in time,
originally, 100 million people should have been vaccinated, but because of the syringe, only 80 million people could be vaccinated …
(* It seems that the number of people who can be vaccinated will decrease by about 20% if they only use the syringe that is for 5 times…)
By the way, in Osaka …
They are considering changing the layout of the vaccination site because the number of vaccinations that can be given has changed from 6 to 5 …!
No … securing a syringe (for 6 times) should be in time for the start of inoculation …
And to change the story, yesterday, 838 people were added due to the omission of reports on the number of infected people in Tokyo …!
The cause seems to be “the staff of the health center often forgot to press the registration button” …!
It is a big problem that more than 800 people did not be reported, so I think that the person in charge such as the Governor of Tokyo should apologize firmly …
However, in fact, if you look closely at the realistic numbers, out of 838 corrections ↓
＜Nov ’20＞
| Date | Corrections | Number of Infected Persons Announced |
| 11/18 | 1 | 485 |
| 11/19 | 0 | 531 |
| 11/20 | 0 | 522 |
| 11/21 | 1 | 538 |
| 11/22 | 0 | 390 |
| 11/23 | 1 | 314 |
| 11/24 | 2 | 186 |
| 11/25 | 2 | 400 |
| 11/26 | 1 | 481 |
| 11/27 | 1 | 569 |
| 11/28 | 0 | 561 |
| 11/29 | 1 | 418 |
| 11/30 | 1 | 311 |
＜Dec ’20＞
| Date | Corrections | Number of Infected Persons Announced |
| 12/1 | 0 | 370 |
| 12/2 | 1 | 500 |
| 12/3 | 0 | 532 |
| 12/4 | 10 | 449 |
| 12/5 | 1 | 583 |
| 12/6 | 1 | 327 |
| 12/7 | 2 | 299 |
| 12/8 | 3 | 351 |
| 12/9 | 2 | 572 |
| 12/10 | 1 | 600 |
| 12/11 | 1 | 595 |
| 12/12 | 1 | 620 |
| 12/13 | 1 | 480 |
| 12/14 | 0 | 305 |
| 12/15 | 0 | 457 |
| 12/16 | 3 | 678 |
| 12/17 | 1 | 821 |
| 12/18 | 0 | 664 |
| 12/19 | 0 | 736 |
| 12/20 | 0 | 556 |
| 12/21 | 5 | 392 |
| 12/22 | 7 | 563 |
| 12/23 | 10 | 748 |
| 12/24 | 7 | 888 |
| 12/25 | 6 | 884 |
| 12/26 | 5 | 949 |
| 12/27 | 0 | 708 |
| 12/28 | 10 | 481 |
| 12/29 | 13 | 856 |
| 12/30 | 17 | 944 |
| 12/31 | 16 | 1,337 |
＜Jan ’21＞
| Date | Corrections | Number of Infected Persons Announced |
| 1/1 | 10 | 783 |
| 1/2 | 15 | 814 |
| 1/3 | 10 | 816 |
| 1/4 | 21 | 884 |
| 1/5 | 37 | 1,278 |
| 1/6 | 49 | 1,591 |
| 1/7 | 73 | 2,447 |
| 1/8 | 67 | 2,392 |
| 1/9 | 64 | 2,268 |
| 1/10 | 16 | 1,494 |
| 1/11 | 33 | 1,219 |
| 1/12 | 55 | 970 |
| 1/13 | 47 | 1,433 |
| 1/14 | 50 | 1,502 |
| 1/15 | 43 | 2,001 |
| 1/16 | 30 | 1,809 |
| 1/17 | 3 | 1,592 |
| 1/18 | 13 | 1,204 |
| 1/19 | 13 | 1,240 |
| 1/20 | 12 | 1,274 |
| 1/21 | 14 | 1,471 |
| 1/22 | 9 | 1,175 |
| 1/23 | 9 | 1,070 |
| 1/24 | 0 | 986 |
| 1/25 | 1 | 618 |
| 1/26 | 0 | 1,026 |
| 1/27 | 3 | 973 |
| 1/28 | 1 | 1,064 |
| 1/29 | 3 | 868 |
| 1/30 | 1 | 769 |
| 1/31 | 1 | 633 |
I tried hard to count the published materials by date and entered the number of infected people on that day ↑, but when I tried this
(although there are many corrections, of course it is a big problem),
since the number of corrections is not so large for the total number of infected people each day, it seems that the tendency of the infection situation will not change.
And those data of above,
some people in the “conspiracy theory” (dry laugh) say, “Tokyo controls the number of infected people!”,
but this is unlikely to happen.
However, we would like the governor to apologize and take measures…
And the topic changed…,
domestic mutants were found like every day, but yesterday 9 people were found …
However,
2 people were using the same facility that previously announced mutant carriers was using
7 people are related to the recently talked about child facility mutant cluster (18 people in total)
We are confused by the phrase, “Mutant-infected people have no history of staying abroad,” but in reality it seems that the route of infection is still known.
However, in reality, it may be that only what was found in this survey of close contacts has been announced, so there is a possibility that it is spreading other than this…
It’s too scary considering that it may spread in earnest in the future.
* By the way…
↑My chome tabs during my article creation lol
I tried my best to thoroughly organize and convey the announced routes, but I gave up because it seemed to be too huge when I started to summarize it! Lol
Finally, the news of the WHO (World Health Organization) research team!
After all, according to one of the members of the research team,
After all, according to one of the members of the research team, “Chinese researchers seemed to be cooperative, but the data of early-stage patients that the research team wanted were not provided, only overall information was provided from China.”
Well, in that case, it seems difficult to identify the source of infection…
And this article↓
How long time the materials such as paper, cloth, plastic, etc. need to eliminating the risk when coronavirus is attached, and how effective disinfection is.
If you are interested, please take a look!
And here’s a trial calculation of how many people in Japan are actually receiving medical treatment.
(Number of people infected nationwide) 419,765
+ (Number of hospital discharges ) 7,157
+ (Number of hospital discharges ) 388,399
= 24,209 people ( -1,437) ← being treated
*()=increase from the day before
(If it is exactly as announced)
For those who are undergoing medical treatment nationwide are…
In Japan, the infection suddenly spread during the year-end and New Year holidays, but as those infected people approached the time of discharge, the total number of people who completed medical treatment began to decrease.
Sales at major department stores in the first half of February decreased by 10% from the previous year …!
The tone of the article was “10% less …!”, But from my point of view, it looks like the following.
“Well, it’s only reduced by 10%? Unlike last year, there are no foreigners? Even though an emergency is being declared?”
What does it look like to you …?
In such situation, but I just hope that COVID-19 will end as it is …
After all, is the drinking party the cause of the spread of the infection?
The mystery just deepens …
Please be very careful when you go out!
AcertainFox512
◆Changes in New Coronavirus Infection in Tokyo◆
| Dec | |||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Total |
| – | – | 372 | 500 | 533 | 449 | 584 | 3167 |
| 327 | 299 | 352 | 572 | 602 | 595 | 621 | 3368 |
| 480 | 305 | 460 | 678 | 821 | 664 | 736 | 4145 |
| 556 | 392 | 563 | 748 | 888 | 884 | 949 | 4980 |
| 708 | 481 | 856 | 944 | 1337 | – | – | – |
| Jan | |||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Total |
| – | – | – | – | – | 783 | 814 | 5923 |
| 816 | 884 | 1278 | 1591 | 2447 | 2392 | 2268 | 11676 |
| 1494 | 1219 | 970 | 1433 | 1502 | 2001 | 1809 | 10428 |
| 1592 | 1204 | 1240 | 1274 | 1471 | 1175 | 1070 | 9026 |
| 986 | 618 | 1026 | 973 | 1064 | 868 | 769 | 6304 |
| 633 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Feb | |||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Total |
| – | 393 | 556 | 676 | 734 | 577 | 639 | 4208 |
| 429 | 276 | 412 | 491 | 434 | 307 | 369 | 2718 |
| 371 | 266 | 350 | – | – | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
*Unit: person (number of infected people on that day)
コメント